charon_lib/transform/remove_dynamic_checks.rs
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201
//! # Micro-pass: remove the dynamic checks for array/slice bounds, overflow, and division by zero.
//! Note that from a semantic point of view, an out-of-bound access or a division by zero
//! must lead to a panic in Rust (which is why those checks are always present, even when
//! compiling for release). In our case, we take this into account in the semantics of our
//! array/slice manipulation and arithmetic functions, on the verification side.
use crate::ast::*;
use crate::transform::TransformCtx;
use crate::ullbc_ast::{ExprBody, RawStatement, Statement};
use super::ctx::UllbcPass;
/// Rustc inserts dybnamic checks during MIR lowering. They all end in an `Assert` statement (and
/// this is the only use of this statement).
fn remove_dynamic_checks(_ctx: &mut TransformCtx, statements: &mut [Statement]) {
// We return the statements we want to keep, which must be a prefix of `block.statements`.
let statements_to_keep = match statements {
// Bounds checks for arrays/slices. They look like:
// l := len(a)
// b := copy x < copy l
// assert(move b == true)
[Statement {
content: RawStatement::Assign(len, Rvalue::Len(..)),
..
}, Statement {
content:
RawStatement::Assign(
is_in_bounds,
Rvalue::BinaryOp(BinOp::Lt, _, Operand::Copy(lt_op2)),
),
..
}, Statement {
content:
RawStatement::Assert(Assert {
cond: Operand::Move(cond),
expected,
}),
..
}, rest @ ..]
if lt_op2 == len && cond == is_in_bounds && *expected == true =>
{
rest
}
// Zero checks for division and remainder. They look like:
// b := copy x == const 0
// assert(move b == false)
[Statement {
content:
RawStatement::Assign(is_zero, Rvalue::BinaryOp(BinOp::Eq, _, Operand::Const(_zero))),
..
}, Statement {
content:
RawStatement::Assert(Assert {
cond: Operand::Move(cond),
expected,
}),
..
}, rest @ ..]
if cond == is_zero && *expected == false =>
{
rest
}
// Overflow checks for signed division and remainder. They look like:
// is_neg_1 := y == (-1)
// is_min := x == INT::min
// has_overflow := move (is_neg_1) & move (is_min)
// assert(move has_overflow == false)
[Statement {
content: RawStatement::Assign(is_neg_1, Rvalue::BinaryOp(BinOp::Eq, _y_op, _minus_1)),
..
}, Statement {
content: RawStatement::Assign(is_min, Rvalue::BinaryOp(BinOp::Eq, _x_op, _int_min)),
..
}, Statement {
content:
RawStatement::Assign(
has_overflow,
Rvalue::BinaryOp(BinOp::BitAnd, Operand::Move(and_op1), Operand::Move(and_op2)),
),
..
}, Statement {
content:
RawStatement::Assert(Assert {
cond: Operand::Move(cond),
expected,
}),
..
}, rest @ ..]
if and_op1 == is_neg_1
&& and_op2 == is_min
&& cond == has_overflow
&& *expected == false =>
{
rest
}
// Overflow checks for right/left shift. They can look like:
// x := ...;
// b := move x < const 32; // or another constant
// assert(move b == true);
[Statement {
content: RawStatement::Assign(x, _),
..
}, Statement {
content:
RawStatement::Assign(
has_overflow,
Rvalue::BinaryOp(BinOp::Lt, Operand::Move(lt_op2), Operand::Const(..)),
),
..
}, Statement {
content:
RawStatement::Assert(Assert {
cond: Operand::Move(cond),
expected,
}),
..
}, rest @ ..]
if lt_op2 == x && cond == has_overflow && *expected == true =>
{
rest
}
// They can also look like:
// b := const c < const 32; // or another constant
// assert(move b == true);
[Statement {
content:
RawStatement::Assign(
has_overflow,
Rvalue::BinaryOp(BinOp::Lt, Operand::Const(..), Operand::Const(..)),
),
..
}, Statement {
content:
RawStatement::Assert(Assert {
cond: Operand::Move(cond),
expected,
}),
..
}, rest @ ..]
if cond == has_overflow && *expected == true =>
{
rest
}
// Overflow checks for addition/subtraction/multiplication. They look like:
// r := x checked.+ y;
// assert(move r.1 == false);
// They only happen in constants because we compile with `-C opt-level=3`. They span two
// blocks so we remove them in a later pass.
[Statement {
content:
RawStatement::Assign(
result,
Rvalue::BinaryOp(BinOp::CheckedAdd | BinOp::CheckedSub | BinOp::CheckedMul, ..),
),
..
}, Statement {
content:
RawStatement::Assert(Assert {
cond: Operand::Move(cond),
expected,
}),
..
}, ..]
if result.is_local()
&& let Some((sub, ProjectionElem::Field(FieldProjKind::Tuple(2), p_id))) =
cond.as_projection()
&& sub.is_local()
&& cond.var_id() == result.var_id()
&& p_id.index() == 1
&& *expected == false =>
{
// We leave this assert intact; it will be simplified in
// [`remove_arithmetic_overflow_checks`].
return;
}
_ => return,
};
// Remove the statements.
let keep_len = statements_to_keep.len();
for i in 0..statements.len() - keep_len {
statements[i].content = RawStatement::Nop;
}
}
pub struct Transform;
impl UllbcPass for Transform {
fn transform_body(&self, ctx: &mut TransformCtx<'_>, b: &mut ExprBody) {
for block in b.body.iter_mut() {
block.transform_sequences(&mut |seq| {
remove_dynamic_checks(ctx, seq);
Vec::new()
});
}
}
}